- Con to the question "Should Recreational Marijuana Be Legal?"
“[R]ecreational weed comes with health, safety and social costs that make legalizing marijuana a dangerous proposal for Nevadans…
Legalizing weed would jeopardize the health of countless Nevadans, expose more people to drug abuse and addiction, put excessive stress on the state’s health-care facilities and do little to relieve the state’s bloated prison population.
The pro-pot lobby hails marijuana as relatively harmless. But that’s misleading, at best.
Marijuana contains nearly 500 dangerous chemicals when inhaled or ingested, including about five times more tars and other cancer-causing agents than tobacco smoke. Cancer, respiratory diseases, mental illness, birth defects, reproductive problems and irreversible brain damage are all linked to marijuana use.
And no matter how much pot enthusiasts argue otherwise, marijuana is both addictive — one in 10 people who try pot will become hooked on it — and a gateway to more deadly drugs that kill more than 45,000 Americans a year.”
“Pot Legalization a Bad Bet for Nevada,” reviewjournal.com, Nov. 7, 2016
- Theoretical Expertise Ranking:
Media and Academic Journals
Mainstream print, broadcast, radio, and internet media entities such as the New York Times, CNN, Fox News, ABC News, the Wall Street Journal, National Public Radio, etc., as well as influential academic journals such as the Journal of the American Medical Association, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Foreign Policy, etc.
“The Review-Journal is Nevada’s largest newspaper, which serves all of Southern Nevada and publishes daily.”
“Contact Us,” reviewjournal.com (accessed on Jan. 6, 2018)
- Daily newspaper
- Quoted in:
- Pro & Con Quotes: Should Recreational Marijuana Be Legal?